← All races
2026-07-29 Wednesday Night
Wednesday Night · Critical Mass
Course Plot
Time
Maneuver Analysis
Maneuver log
Polar Performance
% of target speed by point of sail
Target curves shown
Race Summary

Wind & Comparable Races

True wind ranged 5.4–15.8 kn (avg 10.1 kn) — light-to-moderate, per the race note, and close to race 9 (2026-07-27, avg 9.1 kn, 4.5–15.5 kn), the most recent and best-matched comparable on wind.

Overall this was the stronger downwind race of the pair: 80.6% of polar target downwind against race 9's 62.3%, while upwind performance was similar between the two (73.8% vs 71.5%). Upwind VMG averaged 3.32 kn against a 4.42 kn target (75% of target VMG), with TWA running 3.8° wide of target (42.9° vs 39.1°) — a smaller gap than most races reviewed. Downwind angle was close to optimal (152.6° vs a 149.8° target, 2.8° deep), a much tighter match than race 9's 21.9° deviation, and the strong 80.6% run percentage reflects that better angle discipline.

Fifteen tacks lost 36.3% on average with 6.6s recovery, and five gybes lost 26.7% — both roughly in line with the rest of the dataset. Three mark roundings were logged, still too few for reliable leg-by-leg splits. The Vakaros line was never pinged this race, so no distance-to-line figure is available; boat speed just after the gun was approximately 5.0 kn. Heel while beating averaged 18.3° with a clear positive imbalance (+5.9° signed) — the largest signed heel skew recorded so far, which could reflect more time on one tack, uneven crew weight, or a rig asymmetry; the data can't distinguish between those. The two clearest strengths were downwind performance (the best run result recorded) and tight downwind angle discipline; the two most important gaps were the recurring upwind angle deviation and the beat heel imbalance.

MetricThis RaceRace 9 (2026-07-27)
TWS avg (range)10.1 kn (5.4–15.8)9.1 kn (4.5–15.5)
Beat % of target73.8%71.5%
Run % of target80.6%62.3%
Run TWA (actual vs target)152.6° vs 149.8°170.6° vs 148.7°
Tacks (n / avg loss)15 / 36.3%8 / 34.2%

Coaching Recommendations

  1. Downwind was the standout this race (80.6% of target with angle within 3° of optimal, the best run result recorded) — identify what changed from race 9 and work to repeat it.
  2. Upwind TWA ran 3.8° wide of target — a smaller version of a pattern seen across several races; keep working on pointing without giving up the current speed.
  3. Beat heel showed a +5.9° signed imbalance, the largest recorded — worth checking crew weight placement or rig tune for a possible asymmetry.
Fleet Comparison
PosSailBoatTypeSkipperHCapElapsedCorrectedDeltaFinish
1ChaosMark Gosine3001:03:4701:19:5200:00:0019:18:47
2613SpitfireEtchellsAlyson Petsche11401:14:3501:21:07-00:01:1519:29:35
332567VagrantGrant Gordon11401:18:1601:25:08-00:05:1519:33:16
4Five of HartsGordon Hart8101:14:5401:25:54-00:06:0219:29:54
5TridentRichard Gerstenberger8701:15:4101:25:57-00:06:0419:30:41
656EquinoxC&C 99Rod Stright9901:17:1801:26:06-00:06:1319:32:18
729EclipseTyler Ford12001:21:3101:27:50-00:07:5819:36:31
8Critical MassLindsay McRory12301:23:5201:29:57-00:10:0519:38:52
926CyanaraC&C 110Garrett Landry10201:25:1301:34:28-00:14:3519:40:13
10Ankit Gaur0DNC - 12DNC - 12DNC - 12DNC - 12
1199050AgentRob Crutcher99DNC - 12DNC - 12DNC - 12DNC - 12
Performance by Maneuver
Mistake typeCountTotal lostAvg / event
Tacks1549.0s3.3s
Gybes516.2s3.2s
Roundings314.9s5.0s
Total80.1s
Time Needed to Beat the Top 3
Each bar shows how much faster Critical Mass's elapsed time (H:MM:SS) would need to be to match that boat's corrected time, assuming the same handicap allowance earned that race.
Chaos0:10:05 fasterSpitfire0:08:50 fasterVagrant0:04:49 faster

Removing all 80s of detected tack/gybe/rounding losses still leaves Critical Mass 8th of 9 — the gap to Eclipse narrows from 127s to 47s, but no boat was actually within reach today. No fabricated placements here — the numbers just don't stretch that far.

True Wind Speed