← All races
2026-08-24 Monday Night
Monday Night · Critical Mass
Course Plot
Time
Maneuver Analysis
Maneuver log
Polar Performance
% of target speed by point of sail
Target curves shown
Race Summary

Wind & Comparable Races

True wind ranged 4.5–20.9 kn (avg 11.7 kn) — a solid mid-range breeze with a strong puff near the top end. The closest comparable by average wind is race 2 (2026-07-20, "WoW", avg 13.1 kn, 2.9–22.7 kn), the nearest match among all logged races.

Overall the boat achieved 85.3% of polar target upwind, 83.1% on the reach, and 84.6% downwind — all clearly ahead of race 2's 75.3%/68.2%/67.2%, despite similar wind strength. The reach result stands out: 83.1% is a marked jump from the 38.8–46.0% reach performance logged in every recent light-air race (races 8, 12, 13, 15), and well above race 2's 68.2% too — consistent with tonight's note about experimenting with downwind angles and vang sheeting. Upwind TWA averaged 46.6° against a 38.6° target (8.0° wide — footing low), the opposite pattern from downwind, where TWA averaged 146.4° against a 163.9° target (17.5° shy — sailing higher/tighter than target depth rather than pressing on).

Eight tacks lost 38.8% of speed on average with a 7.1s duration and 7.4s recovery; three gybes lost 23.1% over 11.7s. Five mark roundings were logged, each a large bear-away/head-up turn (22–60% speed loss) — expected for rounding rather than straight-line tack/gybe technique. Heel averaged 17.9° upwind, easing to 8.5° on the reach and 6.6° downwind, a fairly powered-up upwind mode broadly in line with race 2's 20.3° beat heel at similar wind strength. The two clearest strengths were the reach jump and beating a wind-comparable race across every point of sail with fewer tacks (8 vs 15); the two most important gaps were the tack speed loss and the opposite-direction angle misses on beat vs run.

MetricThis RaceRace 2 (2026-07-20)
TWS avg (range)11.7 kn (4.5–20.9)13.1 kn (2.9–22.7)
Beat % of target85.3%75.3%
Reach % of target83.1%68.2%
Run % of target84.6%67.2%
Beat TWA (actual vs target)46.6° vs 38.6°43.2° vs 38.3°
Tacks (n / avg loss)8 / 38.8%15 / 40.6%

Coaching Recommendations

  1. Reach performance jumped to 83.1% of target tonight, up from a consistent 38.8–46.0% across every recent light-air race and ahead of the wind-comparable race too — whatever was changed with downwind angles and vang sheeting worked; note it down and repeat it deliberately next time out.
  2. Upwind and downwind angles missed target in opposite directions — 8.0° wide (footing low) beating, 17.5° shy (too tight/high) running. Treat these as two separate fixes: point up slightly on the run, foot less upwind, rather than one blanket angle adjustment.
  3. Tacks lost 38.8% of speed on average, similar to the comparable race's 40.6% despite otherwise stronger boat-speed performance tonight — tacking technique remains the one area that isn't tracking the rest of the improvement; worth dedicated tacking drills.
Fleet Comparison
PosSailBoatTypeSkipperHCapElapsedCorrectedDeltaFinish
1TridentRichard Gerstenberger8701:17:0701:27:3500:00:0019:43:07
2CAN 1046Five of HartsGordon Hart8101:17:2501:28:47-00:01:1319:43:25
3Critical MassLindsay McRory12301:29:5901:36:31-00:08:5619:55:59
Performance by Maneuver
Mistake typeCountTotal lostAvg / event
Roundings526.0s5.2s
Tacks823.9s3.0s
Gybes313.0s4.3s
Total62.9s
Time Needed to Beat the Top 3
Each bar shows how much faster Critical Mass's elapsed time (H:MM:SS) would need to be to match that boat's corrected time, assuming the same handicap allowance earned that race.
Trident0:08:56 fasterFive of Harts0:07:44 faster

Removing all 63s of detected tack/gybe/rounding losses still leaves Critical Mass 3th of 3 — the gap to Five of Harts narrows from 464s to 401s, but no boat was actually within reach today. No fabricated placements here — the numbers just don't stretch that far.

True Wind Speed